Industry watch
security grows up
John Thompson captured the zeitgeist when he gave his keynote at this year’s
RSA security conference in the USA. In the past, companies may have focused purely
on protecting infrastructure. Today, the Symantec CEO argues that data is the
most important asset to protect. It has quantifiable value for criminals; eBay
account credentials sell for $8 each on the digital black market, he says, while
credit card numbers trade for as little as 40 cents. Criminals are not probing
your network ports just for kicks; it is your information they are after.
As data becomes a focal point of security, companies are adopting knee-jerk reactions
to protect it. Encryption is becoming an important trend in an increasingly data-centric
world. “That’s where a lot of businesses are going first,” says Mark Murtagh,
technical director, EMEA and APAC, for security software company Websense. “However,
if data is compromised when a user is logged in, such measures are ineffective,”
he adds. It must be married with measures such as information lifecycle management,
and the concept of least privilege - an idea that has been around for years,
but which is sadly underused. “Unless an organization is trying to join those
things together in a common data security strategy, then it becomes difficult
to manage lots of individual point solutions,” he continues.
holistic approach
Companies are developing broad security strategies, but it is a slow process.
Shortly after the RSA conference, the UK government released its Information Security
Breaches report. Produced every two years, it charts enterprise approaches to
security. Six years ago, only 22% of UK companies had any sort of documented security
policy, but the 2008 edition shows 57% of companies with a cohesive strategy in
place. The percentage of firms implementing the popular ISO 27001 security framework
has more than doubled to 11%.
Large vendors are noticing the move towards end-to-end security strategies. At
the RSA conference, IBM presented a holistic view of security spanning areas including
data, applications, user identities and network operations. This makes sense to
IDC analyst Eric Domage. “Security investments are no more just in the hands of
the IT people. It’s now so expensive, and so broadly implemented,” he says. This
move also reflects an increasingly business-focused approach to security, as board-level
executives mull the implications of poor security from a governance perspective.
Compliance fears are more pronounced in the US than in Europe, says Domage, although
certain regulations such as the credit card industry’s PCI stretch across the
ocean.
As vendors court business people with strategic security stories, they have had
to change their product portfolios to address the new audience. Business people
understand business-related data more than they understand MAC addresses and routing
tables. This has meant that that the technical merits of ad-hoc security products
are no longer at issue, Domage adds. Who cares about or understands the relative
merits of heuristic pattern recognition or signature-based malware detection in
the boardroom? “Vendors are saying that they’re the best anti-virus experts, but
we no longer care about that. The same goes for anti-spam, and anti-malware solutions,”
he says.
new bundled solutions
This business centric approach has manifested itself in new categories of security
solution. “Instead of using a variety of tools from a variety of vendors to implement
protection for servers, workstations, desktops and notebooks, security vendors
are starting to roll out amalgamated packages bundled into one suite,” says James
Quinn, security analyst at Info-Tech Research.
One example of this is data leak protection, which is a category that has come
from nowhere in 18 months. "It's an aggregation of existing products," says Domage.
It incorporates existing technologies such as port lockdown, data encryption,
and device management. “There’s nothing new in terms of technical solutions. But
data leak protection has a value proposition. It’s both a governance project and
an IS-level project. ”Similarly, some vendors are now packaging the various technologies
used to protect endpoints into single products, manageable across the enterprise
from a single console.
Role-based access control is another popular concept among companies, because
it restricts employee data access to those requiring the information on a ‘need-to-know’
basis. Similarly, Quinn is finally seeing movement on network access control -
a concept that has been around for at least half a decade. “In the last 9-12 months
the number of clients I’m talking to about NAC has increased dramatically, so
it’s really hit the mainstream,” he says. The idea of vetting PCs before they
connect to the corporate network has obvious attractions to companies worried
about malware infection from unwitting users.
Security is finally starting to become part of many organizations’ DNA - but
only as compliance issues cause the board to fold it into a broader corporate
risk management strategy. For many companies, getting the IT department and the
board to speak the same language will still be a challenge. A properly skilled
CIO - ideally complemented by an IT committee that reports to the board - will
be a good start.